Biomarker of Surgical Smoke as An Occupational Hazard for Health Care Workers in The Operating Room
Abstract
Surgical smoke generated by electrosurgical and energy-based instruments contains a complex mixture of hazardous substances, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), aldehydes, ultrafine particles and viable biological materials such as bacteria and viruses. Due to its highly heterogeneous composition, comprehensive monitoring of all constituents is not feasible because of analytical limitations, cost and the absence of validated biomarkers for many compounds. Therefore, identifying dominant chemical components with available and reliable biomarkers is essential for occupational exposure assessment in operating room personnel. Evidence from multiple studies consistently indicates that benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) are among the most dominant and relevant VOCs present in surgical smoke. This narrative review aims to identify practical and non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring internal chemical exposure from surgical smoke by synthesizing evidence from human biomonitoring studies focusing on urinary biomarkers. Particular emphasis is placed on BTEX-derived metabolites due to their well-characterized toxicokinetic, biological relevance and the availability of standardized and validated laboratory analytical methods. Urinary S-phenyl mercapturic acid (S-PMA), O-cresol, mandelic acid and methyl hippuric acids (o-, m-, p-MHA) were consistently detected among exposed healthcare workers, especially surgical nurses, indicating systemic absorption despite airborne concentrations generally remaining below occupational exposure limits. These findings suggest that chronic low-level exposure may still pose cumulative health risks. While BTEX biomarkers do not represent the entire toxic burden of surgical smoke, their dominance in smoke composition and the feasibility of reliable laboratory testing support their use as practical biomarkers for occupational health surveillance of medical personnel working in operating rooms. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessment and integrated biomarker panels to strengthen exposure–response evaluation.
Keywords: BTEX, healthcare workers, occupational exposure, PAHs, surgical smoke, urinary biomarkers
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Veck S. Surgical plume handbook. Mölnlycke (Sweden): Mölnlycke; 2021, Article.
Zhou YZ, Wang CQ, Zhou MH, Li ZY, Chen D, Lian AL, et al. Surgical smoke: A hidden killer in the operating room. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(9):3447-54, CrossRef.
Bree K, Barnhill S, Rundell W. The dangers of electrosurgical smoke to operating room personnel: A Review. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(11):517-26, CrossRef.
Chiu CH, Chen CT, Cheng MH, Pao LH, Wang C, Wan GH. Use of urinary hippuric acid and o-/p-/m-methyl hippuric acid to evaluate surgical smoke exposure in operating room healthcare personnel. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;217:112231, CrossRef.
Dobrogowski M, Wesołowski W, Kucharska M, Sapota A, Pomorski LS. Chemical composition of surgical smoke formed in the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy-assessment of the risk to the patient. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014; 27(2):314-25, CrossRef.
Van Gestel EAF, Linssen ES, Creta M, Poels K, Godderis L, Weyler JJ, et al. Assessment of the absorbed dose after exposure to surgical smoke in an operating room. Toxicol Lett. 2020;328:45-51, CrossRef.
Tan E, Russell KP. Surgical plume and its implications: A review of the risk and barriers to a safe work place. Journal of Perioperative Nursing. 2017;30(4): 33-9, CrossRef.
Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Preissler G, Jauch KW, Pitz M, Nowak D, Peters A, et al. Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3:31, CrossRef.
Oslock WM, Alkhatib JG, Nkengbeza L, Vilcassim R, Morris MS, Chu DI. Air pollution in the operating room: a call to embrace smoke evacuators. Ann Surg. 2024;280(1):23-5, CrossRef.
Baigrie D, Qafiti FN, LJ. Electrosurgery. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024, Article.
Soon SL, Washington CV. Electrosurgery, electrocoagulation, electrofulguration, electrodesiccation, electrosection, electrocautery. In: Robinson JK, Hanke CW, Siegel DM, Fratila A, editors. Surgery of the Skin: Procedural Dermatology. St Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2010, CrossRef.
Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Pearce D, Williford PM. Electrosurgery: part I. Basics and principles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(4):591.e1-591.e14, CrossRef.
Wu YC, Tang CS, Huang HY, Liu CH, Chen YL, Chen DR, et al. Chemical production in electrocautery smoke by a novel predictive model. Eur Surg Res. 2011;46(2):102-7, CrossRef.
Ragde SF, Jørgensen RB, Føreland S. Characterisation of exposure to ultrafine particles from surgical smoke by use of a fast mobility particle sizer. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60(7):860-74, CrossRef.
Merajikhah A, Imani B, Khazaei S, Bouraghi H. Impact of surgical smoke on the surgical team and operating room nurses and its reduction strategies: A Systematic Review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(1):27-36, CrossRef.
Ha HI, Choi MC, Jung SG, Joo WD, Lee C, Song SH, et al. Chemicals in surgical smoke and the efficiency of built-in-filter ports. JSLS. 2019;23(4):e2019.00037, CrossRef.
Benaim EH, Jaspers I. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review. Toxicol Sci. 2024;198(2):157-68, CrossRef.
Soleimani, E. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene: Current analytical techniques and approaches for biological monitoring. Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. 2020;39:168-87, CrossRef.
Mihajlović V, Grba N, Suđi J, Eichert D, Krajinović S, Gavrilov M, et al. Assessment of Occupational Exposure to BTEX in a Petrochemical Plant via Urinary Biomarkers. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7178, CrossRef.
Marchand A, Aranda-Rodriguez R, Tardif R, Nong A, Haddad S. Human inhalation exposures to toluene, ethylbenzene, and m-xylene and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of exposure biomarkers in exhaled air, blood, and urine. Toxicol Sci. 2015;144(2):414-24, CrossRef.
Makama GJ, Ameh EA. Hazards of surgical diathermy. Niger J Med. 2007;16(4):295-300, CrossRef.
Rahimpoor R, Jalilian H, Mohammadi H, Rahmani A. Biological exposure indices of occupational exposure to benzene: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21576, CrossRef.
Yadav, A, Saha A, Chakrabarti A, Nengzapum G, Das A, Das S. Urinary metabolites as exposure biomarkers of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in footwear workers and assessment of pulmonary function. Environ Dis. 2021;6(3):91-7, CrossRef.
Tokuda Y, Okamura T, Maruta M, Orita M. Prospective randomized study evaluating the usefulness of a surgical smoke evacuation system in operating rooms for breast surgery. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020;25;15:13, CrossRef.
Lee T, Soo JC, LeBouf RF, Burns D, Schwegler-Berry D, Kashon M, et al. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;15(4):341-50, CrossRef.
Gioutsos K, Nguyen TL, Biber U, Enderle MD, Koss A, Kocher GJ. Surgical smoke: modern mobile smoke evacuation systems improve occupational safety in the operating theatre. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;34(5):775-82, CrossRef.
Kawaguchi Y, Yoshizaki Y, Kawakami T, Iwamoto M, Hayakawa T, Hayashi Y, et al. Effect of smoke evacuator on reduction of volatile organic compounds and particles in surgical smoke: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2024;238(3):272-79, CrossRef.
Liu N, Filipp N, Wood KB. The utility of local smoke evacuation in reducing surgical smoke exposure in spine surgery: a prospective self-controlled study. Spine J. 2020;20(2):166-173, CrossRef.
Keeley L, Smalley P. Surgical Plume Alliance. The occupational hazards of surgical smoke plume in the operating theatre. Report. Surgical Plume Alliance; 2022, Article.
Chou YC, Tung TC, Wu PW, Lin BR, Lai SL. Protective effect of a novel smoke evacuation device during laparoscopic surgery: An experimental proof-of-concept study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2024:S0929-6646(24)00581-3, CrossRef.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21705/ijbcs.v1i1.701
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Basic and Clinical Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Managed by The Prodia Education and Research Institute